CSOs to Reps: Don’t Bully Exam Bodies

A coalition of civil society organisations (CSOs) has raised concern over what it sees as growing legislative pressure on Nigeria’s examination bodies, warning that excessive interference could weaken public trust in national exams.

The groups called for a more respectful and transparent relationship between House of Representatives committees and bodies such as JAMB, WAEC, NECO and NABTEB, stressing that oversight should not cross into control.

Speaking for the coalition, Convener of the Social Transparency and Youth Leadership Advancement Initiative, Okpanachi Jacob, said the intervention was driven by concern for students, parents and millions of candidates whose futures depend on credible examination processes.

According to him, lawmakers and exam bodies must engage with mutual respect, guided by due process and transparency, to protect the integrity of examinations nationwide. He said clear institutional boundaries are crucial to preventing politicisation and preserving professional standards.

Jacob clarified that the CSOs were not alleging proven misconduct by lawmakers, but were offering broad recommendations aimed at strengthening governance, accountability and public confidence in the education system.

The coalition also urged legislative committees to follow clear internal procedures, particularly on administrative and operational issues, noting that order and consistency within the National Assembly would boost public trust.

While acknowledging the National Assembly’s constitutional oversight role, the groups emphasised that safeguarding the autonomy of examination bodies remains a national priority.

They further appealed to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, to continue promoting ethical conduct, internal cohesion and strict adherence to legislative rules.

Lawmakers regularly hold hearings with examination bodies to review budgets, procurement and exam integrity. At a recent session, officials were questioned over alleged delays in result releases and exam malpractice, with calls for tougher anti-cheating measures and independent financial audits.